Friday, December 13, 2013

SGR's Gone!- 21% Cuts In Doctor Pay- Hospitals Comment On Effects Of Obamacare Until 2021

House W&M, Senate Finance take up SGR replacement – Hospitals irked by budget agreement – Michigan bans abortion coverage from exchange - POLITICO Pulse - POLITICO.com
"...but it still contains substantially lower payments for long-term care hospitals. " 
{The SGR's set payments in the past- Now the rates are cut 21% automatically. This results in less primary care doctors available for the elderly and lower income, including disability and Medicaid covered patients.} (Don Robbins)- 12-13-2013.

Michigan became the 24th state to ban most abortions in its exchange plans...
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/michigan-obamacare-affordable-care-act-abortions-100985.html#ixzz2nNVLObkI

   How can they ban abortions under Obamacare if abortion isn't paid for under Obamacare?
Obamacare allows abortions and the Liberal Republicans voted for it, that's all there is to it.
 Like I said the Margaret Sanger bill  was only called affordable healthcare act.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

The Only Two Words That Democrats Read In The ACA Bill

   It was actually the (Margret Sanger) bill the Democrats were voting on, not Obamacare.
 That's why they didn't need to read it. All they needed to read concerning the Affordable Care Act was two words  (Margret Sanger,)
  What else does a Democrat need to know about the contents of the Affordable Care Act legislation?
   Answer: Nothing!
  

Poster- "In Flight Ballerina" The Nutcracker (Merry Christmas!) Abstract Don Robbins


"Margaret Sanger Care Equals Obamacare" Or Reincarnation?

  They can think what they want in Washington, with respect to legislation that trickles down on us from above, about how people are affected.
The problem with Obamacare  is that people who are affected have mostly been affected in negative ways.
  The truth is that the people who needed help, could have gotten help through a lot simpler and less harassing legislation. Legislation that would have also been less expensive and disruptive in the financial markets.  
  Cut backs on critically ill patients have also cost lives, already, in Medicare.
  Giving better care for healthier people and cutting back on care for critically ill people seems to be the Margaret Sanger approach to social engineering when it comes to Democrats dictating healthcare through Obamacare legislation.
  The Obamacare fanatics were probably raised on her philosophy.
   The ideas of Margaret Sanger always come out of the Democratic think tanks, it's just that the statements that are relative to her philosophy are usually disguised as political rhetoric.
 Or is it reincarnation?
  
http://www.bing.com/search?q=margaret+sanger+racist+quotes&qs=PA&sk=OS1&pq=margarete+sanger&sc=8-16&sp=2&FORM=QBLH&cvid=5f0eec005f294f7d9518d75e3db8e89b

Monday, December 9, 2013

"The Protections And Standard Of Care You Lost Under Obamacare."

 In the past, -before Obamacare-  the doctors and hospitals were required to follow a guideline of care for each patient, regardless of the coverage on your policy, or if you were not covered, or, on Medicaid or Medicare.

  The guideline was the same for every insurance provider; by law.

Tests and procedures were required for every patient under criteria. By law.

   Today this is not true anymore because of Obamacare.

   Hospitals are not required to treat you according to that patient care guideline, anymore.

    The policy you have is not a replacement for that guideline. Your policy is not a guideline of care that replaces the system of criteria.

Criteria is what guaranteed that you were treated, humanely, while you received services. And the application of criteria protected your individual rights.

   You no longer are protected under that system of Constitutional rights protections and guaranteed a standard of quality of care.

   If you understand that, I can continue.....

   If you don't, then you need to find out what protections you have lost and what the guideline of care is in legal terms. If any.

   Sorry for the bad news.

   That is the situation, now, under Obamacare, 

 

"It is a fact that many people were not covered on an insurance policy that they purchased. But the care for those people was basically the same when they went to the doctor or hospital or Emergency Room."

   More of the expenses for patients that had insurance was covered. Therefore it was less expensive for them. They saved money. In some cases thousands, tens of thousands of dollars. Even hundreds of thousands of dollars.

   That is the main reason people bought insurance, along with the fact that certain services could be obtained by the purchase of certain  types of policies. Like customized policies.

   It is true that some services were not provided for people who were not covered. Those services were usually luxury- or experimental- or extras- or choice in operations, for example.

 

It's not constitutional to force a private business into a government program. Or to be forced into compliance with authority for the purpose of the support of a government program.

  

There is no fairness or equality in Obamacare. Whatever equal treatment there is, is, written into your policy.

"Help Stop The Insanity Of Obamacare!" (This Is True)

     I believe the most deaths that have been caused by Obamacare are from the cut backs on operations for heart patients that were critically ill.
   Some heart operations were cancelled and some were stopped during the operations by orders of the government. ( I was one of those patients.)
   I wasn't told that the operation I was undergoing wasn't completed. I was turned out in that condition, from the hospital.
   Later, I was rescheduled to return to complete the operation. I went to the same hospital and was denied care for the second time. I haven't gone back
   It would be easy to die from that condition if your heart was weaker than mine. Or the patient was elderly.
    I have no doubts that people have died because of the government orders.
  My doctors didn't explain why they were told to stop the operation on my heart in the middle of placing stents in arteries inside my heart, they just were.
  They don't seem to be held accountable for any of it. Like, it's the governments fault if you are injured or mistreated. And there is nothing that the patient can legally do about it.
   The patients were told that if they experience pain to take a pill for it.
  There are some good medicines for that but it wont stop the heart from failing.
   Please call your Senator or Representatives and help put a stop to this insanity!
  Thank you! 
                                           Don Robbins