Monday, December 15, 2014
Sunday, December 14, 2014
Easy To Read. Not Complicated-Mr President. "Persons Who Are Protected By Geneva Convention"
Reaffirming further that the provisions of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and of this Protocol must be fully applied in all circumstances to all persons who are protected by those instruments, without any adverse distinction based on the nature or origin of the armed conflict or on the causes espoused by or attributed to the Parties to the conflict,Preamble to protocols14a77fdc125641e0052b079
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977.
2. The following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever, whether committed by civilian or by military agents:(a) violence to the life, health, or physical or mental well-being of persons, in particular:
(i) murder;
(ii) torture of all kinds, whether physical or mental;
(iii) corporal punishment; and
(iv) mutilation;
Art 87. Duty of commanders1. The High Contracting Parties and the Parties to the conflict shall require military commanders, with respect to members of the armed forces under their command and other persons under their control, to prevent and, where necessary, to suppress and to report to competent authorities breaches of the Conventions and of this Protocol.
2. In order to prevent and suppress breaches, High Contracting Parties and Parties to the conflict shall require that, commensurate with their level of responsibility, commanders ensure that members of the armed forces under their command are aware of their obligations under the Conventions and this Protocol.
3. The High Contracting Parties and Parties to the conflict shall require any commander who is aware that subordinates or other persons under his control are going to commit or have committed a breach of the Conventions or of this Protocol, to initiate such steps as are necessary to prevent such violations of the Conventions or this Protocol, and, where appropriate, to initiate disciplinary or penal action against violators thereof.
Security Detention- Visits From GC
(Water Boarding covered in this session. Agreed to in signing of Command Orders. )
At the close of the Diplomatic Conference of 1974-1977, the ICRC made a point of once more expressing its profound gratitude to all those who, either in public or in private, had encouraged it in its determination, had given it their trust and had helped it to carry out a task which required many years of work.
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977.
2. The following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever, whether committed by civilian or by military agents:(a) violence to the life, health, or physical or mental well-being of persons, in particular:
(i) murder;
(ii) torture of all kinds, whether physical or mental;
(iii) corporal punishment; and
(iv) mutilation;
Art 87. Duty of commanders1. The High Contracting Parties and the Parties to the conflict shall require military commanders, with respect to members of the armed forces under their command and other persons under their control, to prevent and, where necessary, to suppress and to report to competent authorities breaches of the Conventions and of this Protocol.
2. In order to prevent and suppress breaches, High Contracting Parties and Parties to the conflict shall require that, commensurate with their level of responsibility, commanders ensure that members of the armed forces under their command are aware of their obligations under the Conventions and this Protocol.
3. The High Contracting Parties and Parties to the conflict shall require any commander who is aware that subordinates or other persons under his control are going to commit or have committed a breach of the Conventions or of this Protocol, to initiate such steps as are necessary to prevent such violations of the Conventions or this Protocol, and, where appropriate, to initiate disciplinary or penal action against violators thereof.
Security Detention- Visits From GC
(Water Boarding covered in this session. Agreed to in signing of Command Orders. )
At the close of the Diplomatic Conference of 1974-1977, the ICRC made a point of once more expressing its profound gratitude to all those who, either in public or in private, had encouraged it in its determination, had given it their trust and had helped it to carry out a task which required many years of work.
Friday, November 28, 2014
Christmas Scenery Card
Store- More product information: http://www.cafepress.com/thenewc.1442548744
Quality of picture is better from Cafepress. This card looks good. Nice Christmas card to send to everyone on your list. Packs.
Wednesday, November 26, 2014
Obama Knew About Hiring Illegal Incentives Before AHC Bill Was Passed.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/26/businesses-to-receive-incentive-to-hire-illegal-immigrants-report-says/ Illegals hired for three thousand dollars less to businesses than American workers.
I think the Obama Care opponents knew that before the bill was passed.
Obama did too!
Add to script for Johnny Depp- http://donrobbinsnewc.blogspot.com/2014/11/a-script-for-johnny-depp-add-to-it.html
I think the Obama Care opponents knew that before the bill was passed.
Obama did too!
Sunday, November 23, 2014
Forty Thousand Bodies- Translated
Forty
thousand bodies
cuarenta mil
cuerpos
If you’re an
“X” they report it this way.
If you’re a “O” they report it another way or
not at all.
Si usted es
una "X" que informan de esta manera.
Si usted es un "O" que informan de otra manera o no en absoluto.
Saturday, November 15, 2014
Mandates Do Not Mean Standard Of Care- Your Rights -Medical =COLUSION
Meeting required mandates does not mean mandates equal a standard of care. It doesn't mean a right to health care equal to the average policy holder.
Mandates do not create a standard of care; quality health care has nothing to do with mandates.
The legal definition of the care you had the right to receive from a care giver was found in guidelines of criteria. Each patient was guaranteed the right to the same basic care in the hospital or doctors office under a guideline of criteria. That system of provider ship is now non existent.
Obama care guaranteed that you don't have the same rights to health care. Mandates do not cover criteria. The standard of care is a meaningless term.
There is no legal definition to the care you receive, now. The only actual legal definition now, is the mandate set forth by the Affordable Health Care Act. Health care can mean anything. There is no determination of what is required by hospitals in the circumstance of care giving to the patient.
If a certain procedure is not specifically covered on your policy, the hospital is not legally bound to follow any previous protocol in care giving.
Colusion between hospitals and insurance companies is prevailent under Obama care.
Hospitals can work out plans with insurance companies with respect to what they (the insurance companies) want to actually pay for, according to the policy language in legal terms.
Ok, now, mandates are not what is agreed upon with respect to those negotiations. You will experience differing levels of quality in your care, depending on the coverage you have and the new proceedures covering your care at the hospital.
The days of equal care ended with Obama Care. Obama Care Ended Equal Coverage Under Criteria.
You lost rights with Obamacare, not gained rights. Without Criteria-
When it comes to patient care. It's a matter of procedures that are followed and guidelines that are checked with respect to patient welfare. (It was until Obamacare.)
Those procedural guidelines and every day protocols are called criteria.
Was criteria checked? Stanford Medical Tragedy
Do procedures have anything to do with discharge or patient safety, anymore, under Obamacare?
What is being cut out of normal tests and procedures with Obamacare?
Is criteria being met with patients or not?
They just keep saying quality, affordable care, but where's the criteria doc? Where's the CRITERIA?
Is criteria and procedural guidelines a part of the medical protocols now? Yes or no?
The answer is no. Not under Obamacare.
Without Criteria as a guideline of care, you do not have the same rights as others if you have a less expensive policy or if you are on Medicaid. Your care depends on what is covered on the policy you hold, not on procedure or criteria.
With Obamacare you have actually lost the right to guaranteed health care. And lost the rights protections of equal health care.
You lost rights with Obamacare, not gained rights.
You lost fair treatment under Obamacare.
Those procedural guidelines and every day protocols are called criteria.
Was criteria checked? Stanford Medical Tragedy
Do procedures have anything to do with discharge or patient safety, anymore, under Obamacare?
What is being cut out of normal tests and procedures with Obamacare?
Is criteria being met with patients or not?
They just keep saying quality, affordable care, but where's the criteria doc? Where's the CRITERIA?
Is criteria and procedural guidelines a part of the medical protocols now? Yes or no?
The answer is no. Not under Obamacare.
Without Criteria as a guideline of care, you do not have the same rights as others if you have a less expensive policy or if you are on Medicaid. Your care depends on what is covered on the policy you hold, not on procedure or criteria.
With Obamacare you have actually lost the right to guaranteed health care. And lost the rights protections of equal health care.
You lost rights with Obamacare, not gained rights.
You lost fair treatment under Obamacare.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)