Tuesday, July 28, 2020

- Art Display to Buy/Shop - Cart on page. Pictures The Gun I Want

  Buy items from my artworks at Fineartamerica, please. Or DONATE to my personal cause which is to raise enough money to buy some things I've been wanting but can't really afford. Here's some pics- (Art Shop Below)



This gun is called a Ruger PC Charger Pistol. Optics (laser sights and magnifier) are optional. The swing out stock is also optional. Comes with binary trigger or regular trigger. I want the binary trigger. I would prefer to have the 9mm style but it also comes in 22LR.  You can get all this for around 1100. Right now I'm 1100 dollars away from that point.
Donate if your feeling generous. Thanks! Or if your shopping for artworks or Prints for Home or Office use the Display Cart here. Just select the pic of something you like. The detail page is at the Fineartamerica site. Purchases and delivery with Finartamerica. My shop is Don Robbins. Just enter my name on the search at Fineartamerica. https://fineartamerica.com/

Don Robbins 

Thursday, July 23, 2020

"Cancel" artwork-Link/picture- "Best thing to do is cancel the 2020 election." Get poster/Prints- Message to Hong Kong-

Buy Art Online

    

   I hear your not doing as well as you would like to be doing there in Hong Kong. As the Nation of China has taken total control over the region. So I was cooking Macaroni and Cheese for diner. I knew that I bought the Macaroni in the box at the store I usually shop at called Wal-Mart. You probably heard of it, right? Anyway, I started the water so that it would boil before I added the macaroni and what happened!? It's like curls instead!!! I was thinking how did that happen? I don't like the curls, I like the macaroni. And I knew I wasn't good at cooking curls. But I had one and a half packs of cheese mix to add to the cooked curls with a little milk and margarine. It turned out fine after all. Tasted great! 
    Next time I better tread the box more carefully before I buy. It's like if China came to the house, (in my case the evil federal government) and switched my whole life out for fake freedom and fake rights. And took my macaroni and cheese, too!
   Governments can be rats sometimes huh? My government stole my businesses in Bangkok. They helped to destroy a lot of the prosperity from the 1990's. I bet the Chinese government helped them. Is Hong Kong like Bangkok? As far as government dictating to everyone? 
    I am a poor person now. I don't do any business. Ask them in Bangkok what happened there. It was amazing! A lot of start ups on the internet and lots of jobs created and money made. I think government thugs got all my money and stole my identity. But I'm not sad. I know things will get better.
    The best thing for you to do in Hong Kong is to concentrate on investments and services there in the city. You can pool resources in ground floor investments. Go from there. Market accounts might be beneficial in international market trading portfolios. Keep track of bond markets and use for asset strength. Don't buy into fake real estate schemes. Keep assets real. Borrow when you feel confident but don't over borrow.
   Local projects can also help  in development phases.
    What is there to be created will be. Build with attitude. Have fun. Stay strong. Interference is just another drop of rain. Peace.
    

Sunday, February 15, 2015

1998-2000-2001-2002- NOT SANDUSKY- It Wasn't Sandusky- ( It Was An IMPOSTER! )

   1998 Penn State - Reports- Morgan Building- On Campus- Complaints- Suspicions- NOT SANDUSKY. It was an IMPOSTER!
    (Man mistaken for Jerry Sandusky) Man seen in shower room. WAS NOT SANDUSKY.

    2000 Penn State - Man seen by Calhoun (Janitor) in Lasch building. WAS NOT SANDUSKY. Was not Sandusky. Looked like Sandusky but wasn't. Same man- WAS An IMPOSTER!

    2001 Penn State - Lasch building incident. NOT SANDUSKY.
     *McQUEARY incident was actually in 2002. 2001 Lasch building incident and testimony was made up. ( 2001 Evidence falsified.)
     2001 information came from Morgan building incident. Reports/Paterno notes/Police reports were all from Morgan building incident in shower room at 9:30 AM in the morning. Not from the Lasch building.

    2002- Actual incident at Lasch building- McQUEARY did not see or verify the man in shower was Sandusky. It was not Sandusky. It was a man who looked like Sandusky. McQueary was mistaken about the identity of the man in the shower room. In 2002.

1998 - Not Sandusky
1998 - Not Sandusky
2000 - Not Sandusky
2001 - Not Sandusky
2002 - Not Sandusky

Friday, February 13, 2015

In Response To @NittnyBlue2002- Explaining Morgan/ Lasch building Incidents- Evidence Tampering- Cover Up By Prosecution.




@NittanyBlue2002\

I tried to explain what happened as best I could.
  I don't think McQueary lied. I think he saw the impostor and thought it was Sandusky.

   I think the prosecutors tried to confuse the issue, and did. They must have had something to show McQueary to convince him that the incident was in 2001 instead of 2002.
  I say they had evidence from the Morgan building incident and it was used as evidence against Sandusky. That's where the confusion comes into play.
 
  The point is that everything about the impostor and the Morgan building was covered up by the investigators. But the evidence was called the Lasch building evidence. That's called falsifying the evidence.
   No one wanted the impostor reports to surface because it would cast doubt on Sandusky being guilty.
   The very evidence from the Morgan building must have been used to accuse the officials and also accuse Sandusky of rape in 2001.
   That's what I'm saying. The only provable incident and evidence was from the Morgan building in 2001.
   The information that proves the Morgan building incident was covered by the investigators.
  The reports about the impostor in the shower rooms was also covered by the prosecutors.
   Now do you understand what I'm talking about?
  I was a witness to the impostor  in the shower room in 1998.
  

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Questions About McQueary and Janitors Testimony- Revised. Read! Sandusky is innocent.

 The individual  that the janitors said they saw in the shower room in the Lasch building was Sandusky or it was not Sandusky? The small person, that was with the man they said they thought was Sandusky, a small man or a child?  
 Was the small person the same as the person McQuery said he saw in the shower room with the person he thought was Jerry Sandusky?
  Can the prosecutors (investigators) match the individual that McQueary said he saw with Sandusky  (in the Lasch building) to the small person the janitors said they saw with Sandusky?  
    Did McQueary ever give a description? Did the janitors? Did their description match? 
  " Now wait!" Was the small person that Calhoun (Jim Calhoun,)  saw with me in 1998 in the Student Services Building - (this was  before the incident with Petrosky in 2000), the same as the person he saw in 2000 with Petrosky? I THINK IT WAS.
   I think the same person was also seen by McQuery in 2000 or 2001 or whenever he said he saw a person who looked like Sandusky with a small person who appeared to be a child, maybe 12 years old. I believe that in all three incidents, the small person was actually a adult male, but just small.  
    What I'm saying is that there was a man who people mistook as Sandusky. He had a male friend who was small that people thought was a young boy. McQuery saw them together thinking it was Sandusky. The janitors saw them together and thought it was Sandusky. Calhoun and I saw them together. Calhoun was told the person in the shower room he saw with me in 1998 was Sandusky but it wasn't. He believed the small man was a child, but he wasn't. I knew the small man was not a child that Calhoun and I saw in the shower room. I knew the man who looked like Sandusky wasn't. 
    I believe Sandusky is in jail because of mistaken identity and being framed. That's all.