"NCAA - FREEH- Partnership In Persecutions- Penn State Trials and Investigations" (2001 Evidence) "Witch Hunt"

   I'm saying that Freeh's office had the 2001 information, and (they did) to begin with, assume,  that it was about Sandusky. And then, sometime later, realized  that it wasn't actually about Sandusky. They knew it wasn't because they could check it. But never admitted or reported that they did.
   At some time the information was talked about or shared with the NCAA. At that point the NCAA believed the officials to be guilty- at Penn State- of covering for Sandusky.
   That's fine, but you have to understand that it was also possible for the NCAA to check the information from the 2001 incident and make the determination that the information was falsified.
  They did not try to validate the 2001 information. They did not check sources, They did not look into the actual incident at the Morgan building.
   It's like they knew the accusations would stick, after seeing the 2001 evidence. And they went with the sanctions. (Regardless of the truth.)
  The question is; After learning about the emails between the Freeh office and the NCAA, did the NCAA know the information was falsified?
   If the NCAA checked the 2001 information, they would not  have accused the officials. It's that simple. But they did. That's all. They did.
   Jerry Sandusky was falsely accused and the officials were falsely accused by the NCAA. There was a partnership in persecutions.
    My conclusion is that the Freeh office and the NCAA knew the 2001 information, that they accused the officials of covering, was in fact falsified. They knew the information did not prove Sandusky guilty of molesting any child in a shower room on 2001.
   The NCAA knew the information was not covered up by officials. They knew together and went ahead with the witch hunt.