Dept. of Education- Clery Act; - 2001 Info.- Sandusky Falsely Imprisoned- Penn State Set Up- (Opinion) DRR.

  

In and before 1998 at the Morgan building shower room. The guy who looked like Jerry Sandusky was running around the campus, and shower rooms, doing stuff to make people believe it was Jerry Sandusky. Him and his accomplice.

   Calhoun saw the man once, at the same time I did, in 1998 in the shower room in the Morgan building. (Student Athlete Services). Calhoun was told that the man was Sandusky, but it wasn’t actually Sandusky.

   Apparently the imposter was in the Lasch building in 2000, when Calhoun and Petrosky saw him in the shower room with his partner. Calhoun believed it was Sandusky but it wasn’t. It was the same man he saw in the Morgan building in 1998.

    I believe that McQueary also saw the same man in the Lasch building in 2002.

    I believe that the man who looked like Sandusky was told to do things to make people suspicious of Jerry Sandusky.

    I believe that if there was a child abused by a man who was thought to be Sandusky it was actually the imposter. NOT SANDUSKY.

 But I also believe that there was conspiracy in the testimonies against Sandusky before and during the trial.

  The evidence from 2001 was falsified. It was possible to check the information and conclude that the information wasn’t about Sandusky in the Lasch building in 2001.

       I believe the prosecutors acted with Freeh and Kelly and set the officials up and accused the University as they implicated Sandusky and falsely accused them of wrongdoing.

  I believe Jerry Sandusky is innocent.

 I believe the Penn State officials were accused when the prosecutors knew they had committed no violations.

  I believe that the NCAA acted irresponsibly in the matter. They should have checked the evidence from 2001. They didn’t. They should have taken into consideration the possibility of the school –Sandusky-the officials being set up. They didn’t.

   When the facts are considered, in the future, about the framing of Penn State by investigators and State agencies, with support from local officials and authorities, I believe that the reasoning behind the actions against Penn State were fostered in politics. I believe that validating and substantiating Query laws was a primary motivation in the actions of corruption that led to the false imprisonment of Jerry Sandusky and the false accusation against the University and Penn State officials.

                                  Don Robbins. -

 

 The Department Of Education investigation; Where is the 2001 incident information?  Is collusion a part of this picture?

Collusion

[ kəˈlo͞oZHən ]

NOUN

noun: collusion

secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others:

From WIKIPEDIA:

Penn State University[edit]

Main article: Penn State sex abuse scandal

The U.S. Department of Education is investigating Penn State over the Penn State sex abuse scandal. Their investigation arises from the university administration's alleged failure to report allegations of sex offenses on campus by a former school official as being a violation of the Act. Former Penn State Defensive Coach Jerry Sandusky has been convicted of sexually abusing several young boys over several years, including incidents on campus.^[13] A campus safety advocacy group called the scandal "the most extensive investigation the Department of Education has ever conducted".

  The Clery laws:

Clery Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act^[1]

Long title	Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act
Nicknames	Clery Act
Enacted by	the 101st United States Congress
Citations
Public Law	Pub.L. 101–542
Codification
Acts amended	Higher Education Act of 1965
Titles amended	20
U.S.C. sections amended	20 U.S.C. § 1092, et al
Legislative history
Introduced in the Senate as "Student Athlete Right-to-Know Act" (S. 580) by Bill Bradley (D-NJ) on March 15, 1989 Committee consideration by Senate Labor Passed the Senate on February 22, 1990 (voice vote) Passed the House as the "Student Right-to-Know and Campus Security Act" on June 5, 1990 (without objection) Reported by the joint conference committee on October 16, 1990; agreed to by the House on October 22, 1990 (voice vote) and by the Senate on October 24, 1990 (voice vote) Signed into law by President George H. W. Bush on November 8, 1990
Major amendments
Pub.L. 102–26 Pub.L. 102–325 Pub.L. 105–244 Pub.L. 106–386
v t e

The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act or Clery Act is a federal statute codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1092(f), with implementing regulations in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations at 34 C.F.R. 668.46.
The Clery Act requires all colleges and universities that participate in federal financial aid programs to keep and disclose information about crime on and near their respective campuses. Compliance is monitored by the United States Department of Education, which can impose civil penalties, up to $35,000 per violation, against institutions for each infraction and can suspend institutions from participating in federal student financial aid programs.