The Main Question About The Penn State Case - 2001 Information- Who Had It?

  No one had the information from the actual 2001 shower room incident. (1 ) Where did the prosecution get the information? 
   The 2001 incident information was gathered after 2001. 
   *Yes. The Paterno house was broken into in 1998. I said it was. I knew it was. But the 2001 information came from the same people. That's what I'm saying.
    So what was the 1998 information and where did it come from? The same people!
   The question is who were the people that gave the prosecutors information?
  And how did Kelly know that the 2001 information was on a paper in the office of the head of campus security? No one knew the 2001 information was typed on the paper. 

(Sandusky was NOT involved in the actual 2001 incident.)

(1) The information they had from 2001 that made them think there was a Sandusky incident in 2001. That is the information.
 I said, that because of the nature of the information, it had to be obtained in secret.

It was used to accuse. To accuse Sandusky of an act in 2001, when it was first said to have been in 2002.
The 2001 evidence was used to convince the prosecutors to change the date of the accusation from 2002 to 2001.

It is known that the incident in 2001 happened (I was a witness) and the 2001 incident didn't apply to Sandusky in any way; That means that the 2002 incident was the actual incident! And that any information from the 2001 incident does not apply to Sandusky or Penn state officials covering up the information.

 There was a cover up! The investigators covered up, where, the 2001 information was obtained from. (And probably who it was obtained from.)

And the cover up of the fact that the information was known to be falsified but used to try and convict those who were  accused, anyway.